Another Smart Card: Swyp

Disclaimer: This website is monetized by ads and other affiliates. As such, this article may contain affiliate links. If you decide to use them, you can sleep easier knowing you're helping me give my cats a better life. :) I really appreciate your support!

Just a few days after I compared the 3 top contenders in the “smart” card world, another one pops up: Swyp. Check it out…

Swyp is interesting. It’s not as high tech as Plastc and it’s not as low tech as Wallaby. Instead, it’s basically a hybrid of Plastc and Wallaby, which makes it somewhat similar to Coin. Is that confusing? I hope not. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of this card.


  • The card learns you’re preferences, similar to Wallaby. For example, if you use a specific card every time you go to the grocery store, Swyp will remember and automatically select that card when you go to checkout.
  • Swyp can hold 25 cards! That’s more than Coin and Plastc.
  • It’s made out of metal, which is just cool.
  • The battery lasts about 2 years, just like Coin, but unlike Coin, it’s rechargeable! In other words, you’re $100 purchase won’t just be a crappy paperweight after 2 years.


  • No EMV or NFC support. What is this 1999?

How It Compares

Mag Strip:YesYesYesYes
Chip & PIN:NoYesNoNo
Card Limit:8 Cards20 CardsUnknown25 Cards
Battery Charge:2 Years30 DaysUnknown2 Years
Warranty:If Defective1 YearUnknownUnknown
Ship Date:Summer 2015Summer 2015UnknownFall 2015
Waterproof:Water ResistantYesUnknownUnknown


Swyp is a cheap option if you don’t care about EMV or NFC. Personally, I won’t be preordering one due to the lack of EMV support. What are your thoughts, is this the smart card you’ll be preordering?

For a limited time, Swyp is only $49 + $5 to ship. Here’s the Link (if there are referral links in the comments, please use those).

As a side note, I did not preorder this card, so I do not have a referral link. If you did preorder it and have a referral link, leave it in the comments for others to use.

Leave a Comment:

Add Your Reply